They are intentionally confusing engine noise rules with the intractable problem of sonic booms, caused by shock waves in the air
-
-
I appreciate the reply, in spite of the fact that I clearly replied before reading the whole rest of the thread
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry,
@Pinboard... you're the only one who doesn't know what they're talking about. This amendment would require the FAA to design standard -
The fuel efficiency point made in the Boom article refers to take-off and landing standards. Different than a sonic boom standard.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.