struggling to find a way to make it more clear: it costs $25 year. For each year, twenty five American dollars. 2500 cents.
-
-
Replying to @Pinboard @Walker023
I'll agree the language on the site seems confusing. Maybe the site should do away with the regular + extra = total and just have total/yr.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Agreed. Apparently not coming across that I do not pay the $11/yr-I signed up years ago for a one time fee. I’m not paying twice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Walker023 @jlbruno
archiving has cost the same per year since the site launched, from before the change in pricing model.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard @Walker023
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Just stating that I can understand the confusion and think it could be simplified. Thanks for buying Delicious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jlbruno @Walker023
a lot of the pricing language dates from when I made big changes in 2015. I agree that I can update it and simplify now
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Personally, love the service. I’d be willing to pay more for archiving, but not if I’m basically paying double for what I already have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Walker023 @jlbruno
I don’t get the part about paying double; you’re paying nothing right now as you said
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Years ago I paid for a lifetime license. If I pay $25/yr, it negates my lifetime license since the language says 11 + 14 for archiving.pic.twitter.com/gbfnEiIb6B
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I would pay $14/yr for the added service.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
parse it however you like, but archiving has always been priced the same, in part because it costs $18/user/year to run
-
-
OK. Thanks for the clarification.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.