I realize I’m getting boring and repetitive, but the issue is vital. The Guardian’s story is a primer on how to discredit secure messaging
-
-
totally a guess, but this reaks to me of GCHQ sourced and enforced journalism. G may be prevented from responding or altering stry
-
i feel the editors of many papers are comprised. eg compare
@nytimes horrible front pages against the often great stories…
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.