For me, "Is WL an irresponsible publisher" is more complex than "should irresponsible publishing be allowed"
-
-
First, it's one person, not an org. He is more than a publisher, but less than a hacker at this point.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze and
Also, I find dumping people's private info uncurated like this unacceptable. It's not necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze and
It's done that way because of the ego trip part. Hence the problem.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
He's deeply flawed and does a lot of damage. But I'm comforted by rules that make that hard to shut down.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze @zeynep and
And, of course, my values here are deeply influenced by the first amendment, which doesn't apply where he is.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze @zeynep and
The First Amendment which rightfully does not allow you to steal & share private data.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcslove @mattblaze and
which part of the first amendment is that?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @KDbyProxy @Pinboard and
Asking "which part of 1A is that?" ~= "Which part says u can't steal & print my diary?"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
showing my belly. A twitter debate on this w/5 people cc’d is not going to illuminate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.