this seems clever
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like this idea at first glance which makes me wonder precisely how it would actually be horrifically flawed
-
increases multiple voting?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Arizona tried to do this in 2006 (did not pass) https://ballotpedia.org/Arizona_Voter_Reward,_Proposition_200_(2006) …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thomas Mann and Norm Orenstein recommend it: http://democracyjournal.org/magazine/26/the-election-and-the-future/ … & LA tried it in a local election: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lausd-election-winner-20150717-story.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
right now this violates federal law, but if it's just a state election, the state can do whatever it wants http://time.com/4085367/philadelphia-voting-lottery/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And to take it one level up: The winner is only eligible if he or she voted for the losing party.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that is stupid. we would waste more money to get more people who don't understand statistics to vote?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
elections should be decided through trial by combat, ticket sales will be used to pay off national debt and run hunger games
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we're already piling up $3 set-asides from tax returns towards public prez campaign financing, might as well use 'em for something
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.