But even if it *is* your job, good work is DAMN hard to measure, nevermind capture in a stupid punchcard.
-
-
Replying to @cemerick
Some programmers like talking about craft and shit, but the primary public metric of your work is a HISTORICAL PRODUCTION QUOTA.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @cemerick
Stuff like this makes me want to burn my github account and distribute thumb drives to my friends or something.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @cemerick
The only sane rejoinder to this I can think of is: if you view programming as a *trade*, then signalling steady measurable productivity is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @markwunsch
@markwunsch yeah, I can def see it as a useful reinforcement of a mindful practice.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cemerick
.
@markwunsch The problematic part is it's a prominent public metric, *not* a closely-held view intended to help the individual2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cemerick1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @brentvukmer
@brentvukmer private by default, yes! But: systems & data modelling to ensure granular agency w.r.t. sharing is just as important@Pinboard1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@brentvukmer @cemerick that is a beautiful phrase
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.