@Pinboard I found it not so awesome, but I was using .NET at the time. C bindings are probably much better. RabbitMQ/ActiveMQ are both good.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard The python language bindings are fantastic. I use it with gevent, absolutely love it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard That said, can't speak to stability/solid since I haven't put things into production yet.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard “as awesome as the documentation suggests?” is a bit of a loaded question, depending on how literally you take the documentation.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard don't let anything at all connect to 0mq ports except known and trusted 0mq ports. -
@evanmcc that seems like universally good advice for any internal service. Or is there something specific to 0mq there? - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@xek that's a criticism of the sample app architecture, not the thing itself. The reason for the architecture is well-motivated in the textThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard No. The last I tried, Python bindings didn't compile out of the box. Had to fiddle with library search paths and whatnot.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard we have a few 0mqs processing ~10^9 events a day with no glitches going for 3 months or so. only ever used C bindings, though.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Pinboard we tried to use it, large deployment, 100+ nodes, multiple DCs — it works, given some effort; somewhat slow, sometimes weird.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.