A funny story about how SpaceX dealt with clandestine toilet issues on the recent Micturation 4 flight. This kind of thing is SpaceX's kryptonite—if you look at what breaks on ISS, it's a slog of unglamorous maintenance issues with no cool engineering fixhttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/26/science/spacex-toilet-nasa.html …
-
Show this thread
-
The Mars Toilet has to work without issues in free fall for six months to get to the planet, and then is required by international treaty to work at at least a Biosafety Level 4 containment level (!) while on the Martian surface, which Elon Musk really doesn't like to talk about.
3 replies 13 retweets 67 likesShow this thread -
Keeping their off-grid airless mobile home working is the full-time mission of the ISS crew when they're not exercising to slow bone loss. Making this primate zoo not require constant repair and resupply is the real impediment to Mars exploration, not "we need a bigger rocket".pic.twitter.com/n8tlmmZjBC
1 reply 17 retweets 86 likesShow this thread -
People think a Mars mission would be Apollo on steroids, but the reality would be ISS... in spaaace! If you love years-long research on osteoporosis and mold control then the next two decades of manned space flight working up to a Mars flyby are going to be a treat for you.
7 replies 27 retweets 102 likesShow this thread -
We pledge send people to Mars not because it is easy, but because it offers a forty year detour from properly exploring the Solar System with cheap robots who never have to pee.
2 replies 32 retweets 136 likesShow this thread -
Remember that the current SpaceX plan for Mars is to send an autonomous remote factory there in 2024 to produce 240 tons of propellant using the same technology that died on the ISS despite 6 years of constant repairs, having generated one ton of water. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/86470/ICES-2020-378.pdf …
1 reply 8 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
The reason an entire discipline (chemical engineering) exists is because taking chemical reactions from milligrams to grams to kilos to tons of output is hard even before you try to do it with space dads in low earth orbit, let alone expect it to run unattended for years on Mars.
3 replies 6 retweets 59 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Pinboard
This is actually one of the exciting things (for me): what if we can develop safer automated chemical plants? It’s hard, but it could provide great benefit to Earth-based chemical plants.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brinkwatertoad @Pinboard
Or I might word it: some people who are energized to work on this tech to put people on Mars wouldn’t have the same drive to work on making better chemical process plants without it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think that's kind of the SpaceX/Musk strategy—get people excited about stuff being for real, make every deadline two years out, and see how far you can get using optimism and dreams to motivate engineers. It's not a bad strategy if you don't take it at face value!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.