Interesting meta thread on bad art story. Was it written ambiguously—helps virality? (Larson filed lawsuit first, that’s why chats were public; FB group was tiny private one to support Dorland through surgery, plan to cover plagiarism was to “drag” Dorland in the writer group…)https://twitter.com/dancow/status/1446292353237626892 …
-
-
Expecting meta-meta-meta. Wait, that's just Twitter!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
trust you to get all pata on the meta discourse
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
With a basic timeline (including a two year period when it’s calm and Larson has a chance to ameliorate but comes back with more provocation so things heat up again), the story is less ambiguous—less suited to viral disagreement?
