Amash is right that Facebook wants to keep the conversation around Section 230 (the part that lets forums not be liable for terrible things users post) since that poses no threat to its core moneymaking activity, selling ads through intrusive surveillance-based machine learning.
-
-
Show this thread
-
If you make a trillion dollar business into a billion dollar business, a lot of the problems of oligopoly and gatekeeping go away. And the way to do that is to cut the legs out from under Facebook's toxic business model.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If cpm rates were lower, FB would just try to increase their corrosive engagement and stickiness tactics even further.. balance out declines in price with increases in volume..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The noyb cases may effectively lead to the second outcome in the EU if they prevail, allowing Facebook users to refuse to share their data with advertisers as a condition of usehttps://noyb.eu/en/noybeu-filed-complaints-over-forced-consent-against-google-instagram-whatsapp-and-facebook …
-
make it refusal by default and that might work. allowing users to do something, though? less convinced.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Must be the worst take ever - this will lead to more and more shitty ads that serve no one on every website making the internet a terrible place for anyone but the wealthy who can afford to pay for no ads
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.