I normally hate to pee on other people's fundraising, but I think it's important to make new mistakes rather than repeating old ones. And we've seen in state after state that pouring any amount of national money into state legislative races just doesn't work.
-
Show this thread
-
The political spending cycle is spinning out of control, and as everyone runs out of ways to spend money upballot, the money is moving downballot. At the same time, those races have become nationalized (and therefore tethered to political identities local spending can't shift)
3 replies 5 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
I can promise you on bended knee that there will not be a single political candidate above the level of dogcatcher whose campaign will fail for lack of money in 2021 or 2022. All your donation will do is feed a growing chain of parasites that dead-ends in Facebook profits.
3 replies 9 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
Pinboard Retweeted Richard S. Westmoreland
I wish I knew the answer! But we have to at least learn from failure. Even trying new stuff at random is better than repeating what doesn't work.https://twitter.com/RSWestmoreland/status/1441835332853452802 …
Pinboard added,
6 replies 2 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Before you make political donations based on emotion, please look at what happened in 2020 with Senate campaigns ($15M left unspent in Maine, for example) and state campaigns in Iowa and Florida, where record fundraising combined with massive losses in places we expected to flip.
2 replies 4 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
I'm 100% in favor of political giving if you're doing it to feel good. But at least make people charge you for fresh stories, not the same reheated stuff about door knocking, early money, and chronic non-voters all being left of Trotsky if we could just mobilize them.
1 reply 3 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
If you've ever had your vote determined by an out-of-state college freshman calling you at dinnertime and reading from a prepared script, a bulk text message, or a stranger knocking on your door to talk politics, then by all means support those tactics. But if not, reflect a bit.
2 replies 8 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Pinboard
These tactics are usually about identifying and turning out people likely to vote for your candidate, not about changing minds.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gregates
That is true, but I contend they are ineffective (and when overdone, counterproductive) whatever their goal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard
Turning out your base works (see Trump, Warnock, Ossoff). Your original point that there is no good evidence to support nationalizing campaigns and funnelling insane amounts of money to them doesn't need to rely on the claim that they don't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
All the talk of "turning out your base" is kind of tautological. Please remember my claim is that there is no causal link between political donations and electoral outcomes.
-
-
Replying to @Pinboard
Do you think Stacy Abrams' organization's efforts were not instrumental in Georgia in 2020? Please remember I am not objecting to your headline claim, just this particular bit of support for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gregates
From what I can tell, it seems like Abrams' efforts were quite significant in that election.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.