The situation we want is one where Team A is demanding climate mitigation through a socialist kumbayah Green New Deal (or whatever), while Team B demands mitigation through private sector gold rush electrification with American eagles soaring overhead (or whatever)
-
Show this thread
-
In other words, *depoliticizing* the goal of climate mitigation entirely, while having our big political fights over which pathway to follow. Instead, we have a situation where one side pompously and ineffectively claims to save the planet, so the other side gives them the finger
4 replies 6 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
The first step in backing down from this is accepting that nothing we do, good or bad, can have an impact on climate this decade, and that long-term solutions that do work require retreating from the hair-on-fire approach and aligning short-term incentives with longer-term goals.
1 reply 5 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
I keep coming back to my experience in western Iowa, watching far-right farmers lay into their far-right congressman at a town hall because Trump was making it less profitable to put wind turbines on their land. Nix Samantha Bee and find ways to make people rich from reducing CO2
5 replies 12 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
The other urgent need is finding ways to shut down the polarization engine. We're in a pandemic where supporting or opposing an objectively safe and effective vaccine against a dangerous respiratory virus has become a mark of political affiliation. How is there hope for climate?
1 reply 5 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
Climate change is stochastic, it happens over the long term, its effects are indirect, the modeling is uncertain, the science is not settled and potential solutions all require rebuilding industrial society. In every way it's a harder collective action problem than the pandemic.
2 replies 8 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
If we've arrived at a point where democratic countries can't organize an effective response to a respiratory virus, there's no hope at all of ameliorating climate, and we should prepare individually for the worst outcome until we can find a way to fix the governance problem.
3 replies 9 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
Someone asked for examples of politically salient issues that are not divided for/against on party lines. I'd say we want climate policy to be like antiterrorism or US support for Israel, where the two parties pursue identical policies and fight over who is not being tough enough
2 replies 4 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
The idea is to make climate mitigation an untouchable third rail of American politics like military spending or social security, that each team can accuse the other side of subverting. Right now it's more on track to become a partisan litmus test issue like guns or abortion.
3 replies 7 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Pinboard
All of this thoughts begs the question, is a warmer earth undesirable?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That's another aspect of climate change that's not discussed very honestly. There will also be benefits, though the harms outweigh them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.