It's pretty bizarre to have abortion rights depend on the Supreme Court instead of positive legislation
-
Show this thread
-
I get the argument "this is what happens if you elect the Republicans!". But there's a flip side—why doesn't anything happen when we elect the Democrats? After 48 years, why does such a fundamental human right still depend on whether a vainglorious old person decided to retire?
5 replies 33 retweets 189 likesShow this thread -
During the Presidential primaries, the debate was between taking our medical system to full socialism, or making a pit stop first at Scandinavian style social democracy. And now with the House, Senate and Presidency we can't even safeguard reproductive choice? It's fucked up.
1 reply 13 retweets 90 likesShow this thread -
What is the purpose of electing a party that given full power can't pass bedrock parts of its legislative program?
2 replies 17 retweets 94 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Pinboard
You're a smart guy so I'm puzzled by your periodic statements like this. There are 5 extra votes in the house and zero in the senate. It's not a parliamentary system where the margin doesn't matter and the majority just carries out its agenda.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
When you can't enact your core platform during repeated stints in power over forty eight years, the problem goes beyond procedural excuses. Let's not forget the House and Senate set their own rules.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.