These windows of opportunity keep getting shorter, and the requirements more fantastical, but this Cassandra mode of climate journalism will continue. Emissions got nowhere near zero even at the peak of the covid shutdown. This is a call for absolutely radical, impossible changehttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1424668961308909580 …
-
-
Since people ask, one approach I really like is to aggressively fight air pollution, whose impacts on public health are immeasurably greater than climate change. The changes needed to fight it (moving to renewables and nuclear energy) are congruent with reducing CO2 emissions.
Show this thread -
The more general principle is to look for ways to align climate mitigations with tangible improvements in people's daily life, whether through cheaper power, clean air, or the ability to get incredibly prosperous inventing and manufacturing stuff that gets us to global cooling.
Show this thread -
If there's no pathway to global carbon sequestration trillionaires who we can all hate on for being selfish plutocrats who only cooled the planet on the backs of the working man, then we're doing it wrong.
Show this thread -
Covid gave us a glimpse of a world without air pollution, and we should act on that opportunity while it remains in living memory. People liked it; sell them on more of it!
Show this thread -
The other place where climate journalism is not being honest is the promise that prompt action can still have an effect. We've been really rolling the dice and it's quite possible that some methane/permafrost runaway or deep ocean thing or other feedback cycle is irreversible.
Show this thread -
In such a world, even negative net emissions (a complete fantasy) would do nothing to alleviate warming on human time scales. Climate is not a morality play about human hubris; covering it like that leaves people paralyzed and scared. We should be feeling inventive and scared!
Show this thread -
We're also overlooking that the good Lord gave us a whole backup continent just for this eventuality. Let's tap the brakes on escaping to Mars and figure out where the best sight lines for a condo will be once the ice meltspic.twitter.com/ADwPGk2MNA
Show this thread -
But whether you agree with me on climate or not, I ask you to adopt the lesson we got from covid: with an effective and cheap solution in hand, and millions of lives at stake, we couldn't solve a collective action problem that was orders of magnitude easier than climate change.
Show this thread -
The world of token measures where half of California is on fire but I'm not allowed to buy a gas stove in Berkeley is not the one I want to live in.
Show this thread -
The long lag time with climate impacts means that even if humanity disappeared tonight, we'd have decades of heating ahead of us. So no matter what policies we adopt, "the world is burning!" climate journalism has a bright future. Every year the hot takes will get hotter.
Show this thread -
This is the kind of climate coverage I find vexing. It's like constantly telling someone "get scared—you have incurable cancer!" instead of talking about what it means in practical terms, letting the patient know what to expect, and helping them learn to live in this new realitypic.twitter.com/4OpLbuh7tV
Show this thread -
Apocalyptic climate coverage is only going to encourage denialism and apathy, as well as a backlash once people notice that their lives go on pretty much as before in a warming world. We have a chance to get this right and channel people's alarm in a more constructive direction.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.