I attended one of these meetings (working on an article that later got spiked), listened to FBI, big tech, and privacy advocates all speak up, and was very impressed with how it was conducted. The issue is genuinely difficult. Alex Stamos's thread here is very much worth reading.https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1424054547362697216 …
-
-
With the Apple thing, there have been at least three discussions smashed into one: 1. Who's in charge of declaring content illegal/who does the phone snitch to? 2. What's the right tradeoff for fighting CSEM? 3. What vulnerabilities will this architecture introduce to phones?
Show this thread -
And of course we're left discussing these difficult issues on global platforms that were themselves rolled out as social experiments, and have since optimized themselves to reward performative strife. So it all gets a little hard to handle.
Show this thread -
The problem here is a subtler version of the cryptocurrency problem—being able to write code should not give you a pass from having to participate in the messy process of social consensus, put you beyond the law, or exempt you from democratic checks on concentrated power.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.