The bill would give the Department of Health and Human Services de facto censorship authority over social media, exposing anyone who defied HHS guidelines to predatory lawsuits. If such a law were proposed abroad, we'd correctly identify it as an attack on freedom of speech.
-
-
Show this thread
-
All you have to do is remember back to summer 2020, when systemic racism was asserted to be a public health problem commesurate with covid, to recognize how quickly such a mandate would expand in all political directions, changing with each election. This is how censorship works.
Show this thread -
A suitable firmware update to the Moderna and Pfizer mind control microchips is a far more targeted and effective way to fight the spread of medical disinformation online than this reckless attack on freedom of expression.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's like she's intentionally trying to retroactively legitimize right-wing conspiracy theories.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wouldn't such a law fall foul of the US first amendment?
-
It's a good question, and I would be interested in hearing qualified people answer it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I get your concern, here. How should we deal with the problem of rampant misinformation on social media? It seems like a real problem with real consequences. I think it's a hard problem and proposed solutions I've heard are rife with pitfalls.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.