This piece by Dan Rather is a good example of the motivated reasoning that has poisoned the discussion over covid origins, and ironically a very unscientific approach. Whether science is under attack or not should have zero bearing on investigating how the pandemic started.https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1406611921256828930 …
-
-
My own perception has been that the science has been updating CONSTANTLY due to new evidence over the course of the pandemic. Policy changes have lagged of course but the pace of scientific discovery and the updating of scientific consensus has been astounding.
-
There has been incredible foot-dragging on the scientific side, for example on the issue of aerosol transmission. The institutional rot goes deep.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who’s ‘we’ kemosabe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@readwiseio save thread -
First public save of this thread!
Readwise users: Like this reply to save Pinboard's thread to your account without cluttering their replies
Stats:
• 26 total saves of Pinboard's threads (ranked #757)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.