I know this is satire, but having a few years of farewell-themed Arctic cruises is a legit fantastic idea. (The Antarctic has a more complicated response to climate change and we can save it for later)https://www.theonion.com/norwegian-cruise-line-introduces-now-or-never-tour-of-1847082526 …
I disagree with you that we're making good use of the opportunity angle, but that's a discussion about political details. My bigger disagreement is about treating climate change as an emergency (implying something avertable with extraordinary effort) when it is simply the future
-
-
I think emergency implies urgency, not that the hazard can be completely averted. That's certainly not something any EM practitioner I've seen believes or promotes. Urgency is important because proactive action is so much easier than response and recovery.
-
With the increased frequency and severity of incidents, every single mitigation/adaptation action matters and taking action sooner rather than later has massive implications.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.