Super tendentious framing in this tweet, implying that the other 17 intelligence agencies lean the other way. The body of this person's article clarifies that two agencies support the other hypothesis; and the remaining 15 are presumably ambivalent. https://twitter.com/larsonchristina/status/1402720162965491712 …
-
-
Relying too much on the specialists whose funding, professional identity, and ability to sleep at night all hinge on the answer to the lab safety question being "no problem" is just poor journalism.
Show this thread -
Looks like the original tweet I was grumbling about got replaced with a fairer description of the article.pic.twitter.com/AKNItXujJZ
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are what, four plausible scenarios: 1) Zoonotic transfer to civilian (gourmand) 2) Zoonotic transfer to lab worker collecting bats 3) Leak of cultured virus 4) Leak of GOF virus (4.5 Leak of weaponized virus) 2-4.5 are all lab fuckups.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.