It comes down to saying "we have to be nice to China or they'll take even shittier precautions next time." The accusation of malfeasance, if it's wrong, is one they can easily disprove through disclosure.
-
-
It’s more of a “do we focus on helping the USSR put out the fires at Chernobyl or do we turn it into an opportunity to embarrass them” moment.
-
This is more like we're asking the USSR to help us understand the source of the radioactive plume over Europe.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
As in 'we weren't already focused on deathly virus lab safety'? Precise feedback is more actionable. If we can't trust a partner to inspect and provide a clear & truthful report, maybe we shouldn't partner with them. I mean this for every country: no safety transparency = pariah
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.