If you already can't imagine why people voted for Trump, or your thesis is some version of "they are evil", then you're not in a good position to think realistically about outcomes of future elections. You have to be able to confront the present before you can plan for the future
-
-
Show this thread
-
I turned in my prognostication card after two elections, but I am very grateful to the various candidates I worked with for giving me the chance to see Trump districts and meet Trump voters, and come away more confused and wary about my own political beliefs than when I started
Show this thread -
A way to reframe the centrist/progressive divide is between Democrats who got into office with Trump votes, and those who didn't. That the former group is more politically moderate is interesting—you could imagine an alternate reality where the Squad came from deep red districts
Show this thread -
The fact that left populism succeeded only in the most urban, educated, deep blue pockets of America should be a big red flag (no pun intended). As a practical matter I favor trying all the strategies in parallel that won Trumpy votes, whatever their ideological valence.
Show this thread -
I'm afraid that the current situation has reduced Republicans to a cartoon right at the moment when we need to really understand them, not in order to empathize and feel a sense of national connection, but to beat the stuffing out of them in 2022 anywhere we can
Show this thread -
Like if it turns out that non-college grads in deindustrialized cities don't care about student loan reform, but would really dig legalized weed, then replace the stars on Old Glory with marijuana leaves. Do whatever it takes. I would like to see more of an appetite for power
Show this thread -
On an aesthetic level, a brand new State of Puerto Rico that then elects two Republican senators would be deeply satisfying. But on a personal level, I would really like us to win
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think this is right, but I think that the corollary that you seemed to be drawing a week or so ago -that therefore Democratic worries about the viability of small-d democracy in US are overblown - is not right. They get muddled together by Dem partisans but they're v. different
-
I think those concerns reframe what is a political battle as a rules battle, which is one Democrats have always been more comfortable fighting. I would like to see more ruthlessness and less signaling for the refs to blow the whistle, hence my impatience with this angle
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's a false narrative that
@NateSilver538 is setting up though. Thankfully the party doesn't respond to his Twitter replies. These measures are (OMG thankfully, finally!) a case of the party responding to the efforts the republicans are putting into place for 2022 and beyond. -
Basing any analysis primarily on 2016 is a mistake IMO because there's too many unique, confounding aspects of that election. That said, I know previous dem voters who stayed home in Wisconsin in 2016 because of 6 years of frustration from gerrymandering.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.