The whole thread is great. Criminal activity is what keeps the cryptocurrency bubble inflating (with money laundering the principal use case). The basic critique of crypto is that if it doesn't work, there's no point to it, and if it works as advertised, it attracts all the crimehttps://twitter.com/smdiehl/status/1395687848230199296 …
-
Show this thread
-
There's parallels here to the E2E debate. If you build unbreakable anonymous messaging, criminals will use that. Conversely, there are sympathetic people who use cryptocurrency to evade oppressive governments. The difference is in the tradeoff.
2 replies 4 retweets 39 likesShow this thread -
For E2E, the benefit of thwarting mass surveillance so far outweighs the costs that we accept them. But there's no benefit from cryptocurrency that balances out being able to shut down Atlanta and get anonymously paid, or launder hundreds of millions of dollars across borders.
3 replies 17 retweets 78 likesShow this thread -
And let's not even start on "smart contracts", the next wave of cryptomania. In the best case, smart contracts are a way to weld unpatchable bugs in code directly to your bank account. In the worst case, they're an obfuscated C contest where the winner gets to take all your money
6 replies 59 retweets 154 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Pinboard
That's not even the worst problem with smart contracts. The bigger problem is that blockchains have no way to validate data from the outside world. If your contract pertains to the real world in any way, you're at the mercy of whomever supplies the data on what actually happened.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
That's a really good point, thank you!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.