That’s naive. Any such structure for people working together has to fit in and compete with what exists to some degree. And markets require a medium of exchange.
-
-
Favors, exchanged products. Also, competing is a symptom of capitalism. It’s not inherent of working with people
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Barter doesn’t scale to the complexity of 8 billion people and high degrees of specialization of work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Are you paying 8 million people?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
There is zero chance I'm going to barter for everything i need. I'm not going to try to figure out what the grocer needs for every transaction i have and then figure out what i can offer to match. Money abstracts that away so it takes less energy to exchange goods and services
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @philosophene @FinnGeneration and
Could you imagine a wood worker trying to pay for mail order goods? They would have to ship something make sure it got there okay then the vendor would ship their goods. But then he has to pay the shipping company with another good.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's not how it ever works, though. No society runs on barter, people keep track of their debts and it works fine.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
That is my point. It is a poorly thought out argument to say barter should be anything other than what it is today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My point is that barter is a fiction from intro to economics books
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Agreed. It has never worked. Even large stone wheels were preferred to it
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I wouldn't say no to a large stone wheel
-
-
I mean, they are pretty nice and would look great in a garden.pic.twitter.com/h4i8kil28N
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Dammit now I really want a rai stone.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.