I’ve seen far too many execs refuse to take the L and apologize or step back in the heat of the moment and so many seemingly small things blew up into giant problems because in a thread of 50 comments an exec couldn’t ignore one thing they saw as a jab or barb or dunk on them.
(Untagging Matt because he doesn't deserve to suffer). 1) By purity I mean people are incentivized to be the staunchest defenders of what is right, and will compete on this axis. 2) The response I agree with is the fatwa against political talk on company chat, not the dunking
-
-
Do you think companies have any duty to engage with what is “right”? Or is morality not a dimension of concern? Do you think it is possible to effectively engage with what is right and wrong in the world without touching on issues that many people define as politics?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
do you consider it acceptable to ban worker organizing? or do you consider unions to be non political?
-
I think unions are great, and the Basecamp employees should start one.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.