SCOTUS didn’t recognize an individual right to bear arms until 2008 in Heller, so it’s between half a century and a century behind in answering basic interpretive questions about the 2nd Amendment, so we get to see that process play out on social media, which will be charming.
It's unnecessary jargon. Twitter is not a Department of Defense powerpoint presentation, we can speak like human beings here
-
-
but Twitter's also a character-limited medium, and it's by far the shortest way to unambiguously refer to that entity, especially once you want to start discussing the procedural history of a case that passed through a state supreme court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.