Eh.... slow your roll man. The location tweets are very very ambiguous at best. They were certainly not actionable for the mob, assuming the mob received the info and tried to act on it, they’d learn nothing they could use.
-
-
Replying to @thegrugq
I can’t see any interpretation that makes her less culpable than Trump. Can you?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @thegrugq
And the “it’s 1776” stuff, &c. Trump wasn’t all that specific either, but the intent was clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tqbf
That, yes. Incitement, I agree. But the “she is snitching on Pelosi’s location guiding the mob to her” argument is not supported by the evidence. The 1776 etc is 100% incitement to riot and whatever. Same as trump. I agree :)
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq
Yeah I’m not interested in the specifics so much as: are the platforms going to be consistent about this? Or is there something special about Trump?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Sorry, what's the case against Boebert here? Are there some deleted tweets or some context I'm missing? Or is it just the 1776 tweet?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Marc Hedlund Retweeted Lauren Boebert
Marc Hedlund added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, what's in that thread that is in any way transgressive?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think the argument is the combination of 1776/forewarning and pointing out where the Speaker was at the time suggest intent to aid attackers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's fantasy worthy of Qanon
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.