I have no idea! He should have one.
-
-
Replying to @Pinboard
My point is you and others quickly made it about gender, when the reality is just that Senate candidates don't always get wikipedia pages. It depends on their background
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PredictitD
I made it about gender because of years of experience watching women in my field get overlooked on Wikipedia while male colleagues get Wikipedia pages
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard
Great, maybe you can do a study on this then? I'd love to read it, and if you can find a statistically significant relationship I'm with you! But most of the time there are other factors that explain these things, and people just jump to race/gender reflexively
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is a gender gap in editing/participating on Wikipedia, not evidence that male editors are purposely creating Wiki pages for male Senate candidates rather than female
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I read most of it, but maybe you can point me directly to the information that demonstrates your point? And I say that genuinely!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PredictitD @denschub
I'm going to say this, genuinely: do your own research instead of asking internet strangers to do the work for you. At best, this kind of pushback makes you sound disingenuous.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
See I actually have done my research and have the opposite opinion that you have. I'm willing to be persuaded, but unfortunately you guys assume I'm acting in bad faith because I don't conform to an identity politics view of the world.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I assume you're acting in bad faith because I don't know you and you are trying to waste my time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.