Extra style points accrue for being blindsided by the death of an 87 year old with recurrent pancreatic cancer
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who could have predicted that a party dominated by finance and over-credentialed middle classes would care more about institutions than reality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
do you think the democratic party hasn't already been mobilizing until RBG died?
-
Also: what exactly is the downside to raising record breaking amounts of money?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-19/supporters-flooding-democrats-with-cash-after-ginsburg-s-death … idk what the current total is but it's probably a safe bet the pace hasn't tapered completely, even if it's slowed. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, so… the Democratic party leadership should just downplay the death of a Supreme Court justice 46 days before an election? I don’t understand this argument
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm confused by this tweet. Who in Democractic Party is saying the supreme court should be the only (or even primary) issue to mobilize voters? Genuinely don't know who your critique is directed towards.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s literally the issue a large chunk of the GOP has mobilized over for years, so not sure where you’re going with this one. Plus, SCOTUS is dominating the current news cycle because, well, it’s current news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.