because law and order doesn't mean law and order, come on brohttps://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1298709454628651011 …
-
-
Replying to @jfhbrook
The power of it is that it also means law and order!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard
but you surely understand that "law and order" means "free range nazi cops and modern slavery", yes?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
you can't really rebut that, because by that definition that everybody implicitly understands they *are* the law and order party. "wellactually your definition is wrong" never ever works
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Pinboard
the problem with "law and order" as a mantle that the dems can compete over is that few people voting blue want what the GOP means when they say this and many of them don't want what Joe Biden means when he says it either
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so at best you would have to preface any argument about the dems being the "actual party of law an order" with an explainer on how law and order doesn't actually mean nazi cops and modern slavery, *when it clearly does*, and then *also* convince the base that they do want cops
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jfhbrook
You don't have to convince "the base" of anything, though. You're not going to lose California or anywhere else for taking the fight to Trump on this issue. You'll just get yelled at by red rose Twitter for a while
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard
I think the issue here is that you have an assumption that the way to win is to convince middle of the road by-default republicans that they want to vote blue this time, while I think that the way to win is to convince people that usually stay at home to bother to vote blue
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
That sounds like a fair statement of our difference
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.