That's one of the excuses people make for the facts not fitting their preferred narrative. But look at the actual numbers, rebinned however you like.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
deaths are rising where cases are rising, like here in az. grouping a whole country together was goofy during the NYC outbreak and it’s goofy now
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
a one-month period during one part of a pandemic whose public health response suffers from immense and systemic data collection problems does not constitute anywhere as much as one whole half of one story
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup, sure is good that nowhere is seeing their death rates go up.pic.twitter.com/boNsgcmE45
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think we ignore in the early stages exactly how bad infection rates were in places like NYC and Bergamo which had roughly 25% and 50% infection rates respectively based on serology data. Now that our testing is better we ignore that NYC had 8 times the infections as recorded.
-
If we added a 1.4 million covid19 infections only to New York City's case count, and added serology data for the Northeast, the disparities in the current infection / mortality picture would be much clearer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would genuinely be careful with those numbers. I don’t believe for a minute that states like Florida are reporting the truth. We need to compare Year over year all mortality numbers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would think that deaths lag behind cases, because people don't die immediately on infection. Wait two-three weeks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.