The apps I've seen, like the Apple/Google one, would have enough correlation info to identify super-spreaders retrospectively. Though it would also alert some people unnecessarily.https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1263611492017958912 …
You don't need this kind of fidelity if you're chasing superspreading events. 100 meters is fine.
-
-
When there's uncertainty in which models are correct; more data seems better than less, and more granular better than less granular. Can't go from coarse data to fine-grained. But also, I am very very skeptical of your reasoning. There's like 10 houses within 100m of me.
-
My reasoning is that you can semi-automate contact tracing by giving epidemiologists a list of potential contacts derived from coarse-grained surveillance data, cutting down the number of people they need to contact by a factor of a lot
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.