The apps I've seen, like the Apple/Google one, would have enough correlation info to identify super-spreaders retrospectively. Though it would also alert some people unnecessarily.https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1263611492017958912 …
-
-
Why not both? The bluetooth data gives much more granular physical proximity data; ~10cm fidelity. Nothing else I know of can duplicate that.
-
You don't need this kind of fidelity if you're chasing superspreading events. 100 meters is fine.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.