The problem with these articles is not that they praise good policies, and politicians who acted quickly on limited data, but that they create the illusion of understanding where we don't have it. We don't know why New York was hit unusually hard, and why other places were spared
-
-
Show this thread
-
On March 14, weeks into California's state of emergency, the governor of Oklahoma took a notorious selfie in a crowded restaurant. But the virus lacks the moralizing tendency of those who write about it. Oklahoma saw a rise in cases and then they flattened, like almost everywherepic.twitter.com/4rFvqLLRbx
Show this thread -
The assumption that, absent intervention, every major city will end up like Lombardy, New York or London made sense back in March, but does not fit the evidence we have in May. The problem is that journalists have not revisited this assumption and continue to write morality tales
Show this thread -
These stories will continue to get written because they offer a cast of heroes, villains, narratives, and above all, the illusion of control. A pandemic that we don't have a great deal of power over is mysterious and frightening. It has to be tamed and made into a story.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Evolution of perception over time is predictable. First, a stochastic event is as an enormous shock. Then becomes fodder for in group/out group dispute. Eventually event is perceived as a predictable/inevitable moral narrative. eg Trump election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.