Speaking seriously, the internal critique of socialism most often came from the left. Like any religious reform movement, the most dangerous enemies of socialism were not its ideological opponents, but young people who took the sacred texts seriously and tried to live by them
-
-
Show this thread
-
The opponents of socialism point to the empirical evidence that socializing the means of production quickly leads to the end of political pluralism, and from there to tyranny. This lesson was demonstrated as early as 1921, four years after the Revolutionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronstadt_rebellion …
Show this thread -
The problem with having arguments about this with the American left is that 'socialism' now covers everything to the left of the status quo of monopoly capitalism with a crumbling public sector. It is tempting to just wave the red flag and say "sure, whatever," to the comrades
Show this thread -
But if you're really intellectually interested in workers' rights and why we can't have collectives and public ownership at the national level, just know that there's a pretty intellectually rigorous critique of socialism from the left, that argues this point about pluralism
Show this thread -
If you are interested in transforming the relationship between the individual and the state in the direction of justice, and other people tried this but no one in history ever got it right, then study why they never got it right! It probably wasn't because you weren't around then
Show this thread -
We so often talk past each other because one side argues about socialism as a means of organizing the economy, while the other side sees it as a system of power, in the name of the greater good. So we get: "Socialism in X devolved into tyranny" "Because it wasn't real socialism"
Show this thread -
-
If anyone wants to seriously engage with this stuff, beyond six tweets from a jerkass bookmarking site, I highly recommend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leszek_Ko%C5%82akowski …, or more approachably, whatever is available in English by Adam Michnik
Show this thread -
Debating socialism on Twitter is like playing a chess game where the opponent eats your pieces, and then boasts that they are undefeated
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow, how can they double-time the word 'democracy' like that? One has faith that a single-party democracy is a 'democracy,' or one doesn't. If one doesn't, one is not a Marxist-Leninist, and in this conversation should should not style oneself a 'socialist' in the same breath.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.