My sincere hot take on the just-announced antibody results from New York State: I can't wait to see what the experts make of it! Being able to follow real people who share their expertise for free on this site, and answer questions, is absolutely awesome.
-
-
It works very poorly in real science too. See the line about one death at a time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Structure of Scientific Revolutions says they don't back down. They die.
-
But that's not always true. I had a flexor tendon injury (don't recommend) and read a bunch of the literature (do recommend). The treatment dramatically shifted within one lifetime. Some of the best reviews were written by people whose early treatment was upended by the newbies.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It helps to keep the focus on a growing understanding instead of proving a point of view. Both styles certainly happen. Check: can I still get can genuinely excited by someone else’s surprising finding in my area of specialty when it disagrees with me, but points the way?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The right people find an ego *boost*, not an ego *dent*, when changing opinions after being proven wrong. The boost comes in the form of "look, I'm doing science right, and doing it better than you or you would've thought!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.