Deeply skeptical of this "privacy preserving" contact tracing approach by Apple and Google. My stance all along has been to hand over what we already collect to public health workers, while also regulating the space for the first time. This is the oppositehttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/technology/apple-google-coronavirus-contact-tracing.html …
-
-
What this does highlight is the problem of governance. Deploying a new, nationwide contact-tracing technology should be something decided by a functioning Congress in consultation with a functioning CDC, not a fun crypto project for Chad and Brad in Cupertino and Mountain View.
Show this thread -
-
My main critique: you shouldn't bake in assumptions about how this virus spreads into an unauditable core OS feature. Talk to experts. Give them your already-collected raw data so they can return to if assumptions change, or we learn things that change our perspective
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's called "preserving brand trust" and is a key feature of publicly traded firms
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was under impression that phone to phone Bluetooth interactions would be slightly finer grained than the existing location data, especially with iPhones included? Not meaningfully? (I think I get your preference for this being part of a larger reckoning over location tracking.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.