The "something unprecedented" was voting. You're describing voting.https://twitter.com/RespectableLaw/status/1247027589279080459 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Pinboard
Umm no that thing he’s describing is the unprecedented move for basically every candidate but warren to consolidate behind Biden on the eve of Super Tuesday. You’re talking about voting as if people’s choices weren’t more than just Bernie or Biden just hours before Super Tuesday.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @lukkaaaass
Yeah. They chose Biden in a head to head vote against Bernie. What is complicated about that?
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard
Ahh yes I see, let’s just continue to be too dense to see that the actual point he made is about how the arrival at a head to head position left a bad taste in people’s mouth. Couldn’t possibly come off as precisely the sore-winning or condescending behavior that he’s describing
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @lukkaaaass
I don't even like Biden! How can I be a sore winner? My point is that if a candidate's winning strategy was to hope his opposition stayed divided, then it's a good thing we didn't put him on the ballot against Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Pinboard
Because primary and general elections aren’t fought over the same contingent of voters? Bernie had a strategy to win a divided primary, it became rapidly undivided. nothing about the primary would have applied much in the general, & frankly thats true for Bidens GE campaign too.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
What I'm saying is that Bernie showed himself to be a poor strategist, and Biden a better one. The votes don't carry over, but the strategic ability certainly does.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.