With respect, the US approach to commenting on European approaches to 'privacy legislation' has been to not actually read said legislation and wrongly assume it is all based on individual consent, which is but one of six possible lawful bases.https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1245699326522712064 …
I read the GDPR because I had to go testify on it before Congress. I would rather not have to read it again, to be honest. But I stand by my critique.
-
-
yes I saw that back then and I remember reading a lot of things were wrong or misunderstood. Probably still easier to read and understand than perl scripts, with some more work ;-)
-
to be fair, a lot of the criticism is not addressed at general data protection law but at Article 5(3) of EU directive 2002/58 ("eprivacy")
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.