Forget aggregating it. Use the full individual data and put it in the hands of public health authorities.https://twitter.com/politico/status/1242447340507746304 …
-
-
What we especially need is for tech people to outline to epidemiologists the full extent of the surveillance network *already deployed* commercially in the United States, and find out what parts of it will help their work. I and many other nerds are ready to help communicate that
Show this thread -
I have absolutely no idea what surveillance measures you need in order to fight the spread of a disease like this one. But I bet most of the epidemiology community doesn't fully understand the powers of modern surveillance capitalism, since they've been busy doing epidemiology.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
....is this a joke
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Delete your account
-
I can't find the button
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is the point of mass surveillance when there is no universal shelter in place, no widespread testing, and no tracing of contacts?
-
Well you see, he’s a nerd. And also, technology. So.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because once the government uses it in an extreme case, it will find progressively less and less extreme cases. Exhibit A: PATRIOT Act. This isn't some wild hypothetical. It's very recent history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.