In the past, I and many others have called on regulators, journalists, and policy people to move from the current model of privacy as individual consent, to a model that treats it more like public health or environmental law, a public good. For example: https://idlewords.com/2019/06/the_new_wilderness.htm …
-
-
Show this thread
-
This epidemic is another good example of where the individual consent model for privacy fails. If we want to use cell phone tracking to track the potential spread of infection, we have to impose that on the population, and people can't be allowed to opt out
Show this thread -
There are also monumental privacy and civil liberties costs associated to this kind of tracking. You can think of it as similar to forced quarantine: a situation where an overriding health emergency, by public consent, is enough to curtail people's freedoms for a limited time
Show this thread -
But this model doesn't work when the "limited time" part is not available. Cell phone records and user location data, as well as derived information from that (like machine learning models) are currently stored in perpetuity by private actors, with almost zero regulation
Show this thread -
If we want the ability to make full use of large-scale technical surveillance for things like slowing an epidemic (and we do!), then we need a 'peacetime' regulatory framework for the surveillance economy that is far stricter about limiting data retention, resale, and so on
Show this thread -
Otherwise people will correctly perceive these attempts as a ratchet effect to further erode online privacy. In a situation where legal protection is defined by concepts like 'reasonable expectation of privacy', rather than strict objective limits, surveillance powers only go up
Show this thread -
This leaves us in a frustrating position where we have the technical infrastructure for unprecedented contagion tracking, but there is no way for democratic governments to credibly reassure people that the tracking will be used only for this one purpose, and do no lasting harm
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We could probably build a workable notification system in two weeks. Crazy privacy implications.
-
If you have the willpower there's no reason it has to be built as users uploading their own location history. Could deploy devices that broadcast a set of random guids (last,cur,next) (g1,g2,g3) that moves on to (g2, g3, gNew) after 3 hours & infected users upload what they saw.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
this couldnt be enforced if necessary...
-
i mean best bet would be the towers. but you wont get the accuracy implied here like you would with bluetooth or wireless networks or something, and the germs left on the bus go on to infect people all day.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.