If you enjoy this, don't miss the Lancet's new podcast on the future of NATOhttps://twitter.com/BeijingPalmer/status/1237384095619055616 …
-
-
This is a very weird argument. Do you think that politics, government, and culture don't have a very direct impact on how the virus is being handled, and the impact on our lives? FP has done regular global health coverage for *years* for this reason.
-
As a result, we called the epidemic on *January 8th.* https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/08/lunar-new-year-hong-kong-pnuemonia-sars-epidemic-wuhan/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This isn't fair. Foreign policy aspects of pandemics are very much within the purview of a foreign policy magazine. The problem is when physicists try to cover, say, culture from their understanding of, say, particle physics. Pandemics aren't some pure medical events!
-
Your criticism is correct to crude reductionism (everything is particles, let me explain the UN to you based on that) not to explaining very much the right level of problem with the right level of conceptual tools.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I follow both of you and enjoy your posts, but would dump you both in a heartbeat for a Physics Today podcast about the UN....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.