Either your movement can outfox Trump, the billionaires, and the entire right-wing hate machine, or you're constantly stymied by six bureaucrats and an intern at the DNC, but for the love of God please stop claiming both. Don't brag about the end boss when you can't clear level 1
-
-
I'm not sure who would really buy that original false dichotomy? It's entirely possible to imagine a candidate who on the national stage would defeat a political opponent but for party-political bureaucratic reasons was stopped from getting the nomination.
-
Sure that means you can reduce to: "If you can't get the DNC nomination you can't be the Democratic President!" But that misses the point that a party might have internal mechanisms which allow them to self-sabotage their own electoral market.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the DNC has a lot more levers it can pull to get rid of Sanders as a nominee, than Trump has if he's running against Sanders in the general. no inconsistency
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a revolution!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet a campaign that can't defeat Sanders in: a) popular vote b) grassroots support c) fundraising d) national polls ...has no inconsistencies in claiming the ability to defeat Trump?

-
As a non-US resident, watching establishment populist DNC Twitter in action convinces me you're going to gift the rest of us in the world four more years of Trump.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't that campaign fighting Trump and the DNC at the same time though? Maybe the DNC can only win because they share a common enemy with a political powerhouse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No inconsistency here, especially when the war is within your own party. In many ways the Trump matchup is a more honest one because the Republicans don't have a figure like Obama who can swoop in and realign the election overnight.
-
The democratic party has consistently shown - remember when over 1,000 seats were lost in midterms under Obama - that they care less about losing to Republicans than they do suppressing the left wing of their party. This time is no different.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.