Six people on the debate stage running for the nomination of the "Democratic" party. Only one of them affirms that the candidate with the most votes should win the nomination.
-
-
Replying to @CoreyRobin
In a multi-candidate race, this makes total sense. If there's a five way split, why should the person who got 21% automatically advance over the four who together got 79%?
9 replies 0 retweets 28 likes -
-
-
Clearly there should be a second round of voting where random politicians who are loyal to the party apparatus have as much a say as someone who was sent there by voters.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
There's middle ground between saying plurality wins, and that there should be arcane rules allowing superdelegates to vote on a second ballot. Simple ranked choice works fine.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Sure but you realize we're reacting to the actual situation that exists in 2020 and not hypothetical ways of reforming the primary system right?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Yeah. But there is room for political maneuver here that finds a solution between these two bad alternatives.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
You know the implicit "solution" here is giving the nomination to anyone but Bernie. And it will destroy the party.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
I think the "what if's" lead to a lot of drama and we can just have some primaries first
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.