Everyone made fun of the NYT's double endorsement, but we have a pair of fine candidates who between them represent the tension between milquetoast centrism / radical change, are both in the Senate, aren't crazy old or completely inexperienced. Why not just choose between them?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pet Buttigieg could drop out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And Bernie would still beat him at 118.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet somehow he's more of a conservative boomer than Bernie.
-
Bernie is not a boomer. He was born before the war
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And would still have been just as effective a Senator as Sanders has been.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you old enough to remember when Jerry Brown was Governor of California the first time, and a serious contender for President? I was recently wishing he'd run again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He will, instead, run every election in the next forty years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok maybe he should
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mayo Pete could go into Cryogenic sleep for 1,000 years... And Bernie Sanders will still have been born in a year decades before Mayo Pete was born. Wow!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.