Say you have 100 towns of equal size, and every town gets to pick a delegate. You can easily have a situation where candidate A has more votes overall, but concentrated in one area, so that candidate B gets more delegates. There's nothing nefarious or undemocratic about this.
Iowa delegates represent their district. It's the same exact idea, it just gave you a result you don't like
-
-
It's not the same idea at all. One is electing a representative to fight for my district on a national stage who is beholden to voters in my district every two years. The other is an unnecessary bureaucratic step designed to improperly balance rural and urban voters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.