The New York Times runs an opinion piece that draws sweeping conclusions based on incomplete electoral results, by an author who last night publicly accused that election of being rigged.pic.twitter.com/3IGpd4vLRl
The light inside is broken, but I still work. The Cadillac of online bookmarking sites. Alleged nocoiner. http://pinboard.in maciej@ceglowski.com +1 415 610 0231
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
The New York Times runs an opinion piece that draws sweeping conclusions based on incomplete electoral results, by an author who last night publicly accused that election of being rigged.pic.twitter.com/3IGpd4vLRl
To be fair, her argument isn't predicated on Sanders "winning" – it's based on him having demonstrated a "strong showing", which seems pretty objectively true regardless of pending results. Is it a mendacious claim that the progressive wing of the party is ascendant?
Leaving aside the partial election result (since it's unlikely it will change radically), Iowans appear to have voted for centrists over the two left candidates by a significant margin, so the whole thrust of this piece kind of puzzles me.
Why? Let’s say Sanders and Buttigieg are tied (avg of two measures), Warren has more votes than Biden. If you add in Klobuchar center and left are tied, but with 3 candidates vs. 2.
Warren + Sanders ≈ 43% Klobuchar + Buttigieg + Biden ≈ 55%
You’re using SDE but arguable the most generalizable measure is popular vote and it’s 47-50 there but with three shots vs two. Sanders and Warren has a lower delegate/votes ratio.
Oh, I see what you mean. So take that measure, and it's still inconsistent with the thesis in the article. Iowans either preferred centrism, or were kind of evenly split about it.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.