The New York Times runs an opinion piece that draws sweeping conclusions based on incomplete electoral results, by an author who last night publicly accused that election of being rigged.pic.twitter.com/3IGpd4vLRl
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You’re using SDE but arguable the most generalizable measure is popular vote and it’s 47-50 there but with three shots vs two. Sanders and Warren has a lower delegate/votes ratio.
Oh, I see what you mean. So take that measure, and it's still inconsistent with the thesis in the article. Iowans either preferred centrism, or were kind of evenly split about it.
Does this argument apply to the 2016 GOP Iowa caucus, where we can add together everyone who wasn't Trump and argue that Iowans actually wanted an anti-extremist position? Doesn't this argument just boil down to "if there are more centrist candidates, people want centrism"?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.