So the consensus answer seems to be "I heard she's mean to staff", which seems more like a reason to not work for Klobuchar than to not vote for someone who has a proven track record of legislation and coalition building and is under 70, but I bow to the verdict of Twitter
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I heard she was mean to her staff. (Not saying I believed it)
-
I did too. But (and I say this not to provoke), so what? Every one of the candidates has flaws. This seems bad for her staff, but not unusually disqualifying
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
treats her employees and staffers poorly, is what I’ve always heard
-
relatively conservative candidate, prosecutor who abuses her staff and apparently put an innocent kid in prison? running on the “let’s beat trump but things can’t be better” ticket?? where do I sign up??
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A platform of “better things aren’t possible”
-
That's not her platform at all, though
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Many former staff have come forward saying she's very abusive.
-
Yeah, but if the opponent is Trump, what does that matter?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Consensus among my Republican relatives was she would be the most formidable opponent to Trump.
Will almost certainly be VP running mate if nominee is smart.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.