I respect Speaker Pelosi and think she's a skilled politician, so there must be some reason this investigation was thrown into the Senate unfinished. But I don't understand it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I'd also like to understand the Speaker's reasoning for holding four senators of her party back from campaigning in Iowa.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
From what I understand Bolton would have fought a House subpoena as far as possible, but agreed to respond to a Senate subpoena as soon as one was issued.
-
This involves trusting Bolton to not change his mind
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Spoiler: they have no coherent strategy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Evergreen topic on Ken White’s ATPL podcast. Nobody knows for sure but the appeals process to get witnesses in the House would have stretched deep into 2020, maybe through most of the primary.
-
Okay... so?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think you’re on to something here. Parnas volunteering information that the House was negotiating with SDNY on gets released days after the articles get served? Hmmm
-
WTF it is Parnas is doing is another evergreen ATPL topic, with a clearer answer: the House is much EASIER to cooperate with than SDNY, who will demand he be candid about _everything_ he knows, and so his dalliance with the House is probably a bid for immunity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I've heard similar but do not believe this is accurate.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.