The gap between what it would take to mitigate climate change—years of net negative carbon emissions, in a world where even *further lowering the rate of increase* in emissions may be politically impossible—and popular media coverage of the issue is staggering. Oh public editor!https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1212823074216857600 …
-
-
Moreover, calling for ineffective lifestyle changes among urban consumers in ways that will hurt rural producers, in a country where those rural places are structurally overrepresented in government, will guarantee that climate becomes a third rail issue and we all roast together
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder what powers the Pinboard servers? Fossil fuels? nukes? wind? solar? interns on bicycles? On an unrelated note, less than 12,000 years ago, there was a mile of ice on top of what is now Chicago.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As it turns out, that one weird trick to fixing the climate is realizing there isn't actually one weird trick
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In a sane country we would be talking seriously about nationalizing large sectors of the energy industry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I heard Saul Griffith on a podcast recently and he makes a very convincing case that this is possible. Here’s his article. https://medium.com/otherlab-news/how-do-we-decarbonize-7fc2fa84e887 …
-
His argument seems to be "electrify all the things" and I completely agree
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.